Comments on: where’s your blog at? http://www.suanie.net/2006/07/07/wheres-your-blog-at/ Yet another personal blog, only better ;) Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:29:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: ylchong http://www.suanie.net/2006/07/07/wheres-your-blog-at/#comment-9981 ylchong Tue, 11 Jul 2006 05:19:02 +0000 http://www.suanie.net/2006/07/07/dude-wheres-your-blog/#comment-9981 Okay, right there with you all the way save: "...When I found out that the late Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah had a queen 50 years younger than him, I couldn’t comment on that ..." It's not news, as in line with 'Dog bites man', but if it had been... "..The 70-year-old Sultanah took on a 21-year stud as her new play-toy..." then it's NU'ES, along the same line of "Man bites dog..." Bleargh! SEE:( Okay, right there with you all the way save:
“…When I found out that the late Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah had a queen 50 years younger than him, I couldn’t comment on that …”

It’s not news, as in line with ‘Dog bites man’, but if it had been…

“..The 70-year-old Sultanah took on a 21-year stud as her new play-toy…” then it’s NU’ES, along the same line of “Man bites dog…” Bleargh! SEE:(

]]> By: Paul Tan http://www.suanie.net/2006/07/07/wheres-your-blog-at/#comment-9964 Paul Tan Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:20:19 +0000 http://www.suanie.net/2006/07/07/dude-wheres-your-blog/#comment-9964 DUDE WHERE'S MY BLOG ! DUDE WHERE’S MY BLOG !

]]> By: deriku http://www.suanie.net/2006/07/07/wheres-your-blog-at/#comment-9928 deriku Fri, 07 Jul 2006 12:42:04 +0000 http://www.suanie.net/2006/07/07/dude-wheres-your-blog/#comment-9928 <em>'However they do offer this: the OPTION to declare OTHERWISE, whether they are correct or not is up to the judgment of the individual reader to DECIDE'</em> hmm initially i thought this was about something brewing closer to home... ‘However they do offer this: the OPTION to declare OTHERWISE, whether they are correct or not is up to the judgment of the individual reader to DECIDE’

hmm initially i thought this was about something brewing closer to home…

]]> By: delia http://www.suanie.net/2006/07/07/wheres-your-blog-at/#comment-9924 delia Fri, 07 Jul 2006 08:37:20 +0000 http://www.suanie.net/2006/07/07/dude-wheres-your-blog/#comment-9924 i was reading your fab article and then you had to mention tenderloin steak terus my perut berbunyi-bunyi. tralalala... i was reading your fab article and then you had to mention tenderloin steak terus my perut berbunyi-bunyi. tralalala…

]]> By: KY http://www.suanie.net/2006/07/07/wheres-your-blog-at/#comment-9923 KY Fri, 07 Jul 2006 08:03:43 +0000 http://www.suanie.net/2006/07/07/dude-wheres-your-blog/#comment-9923 small voice you say? shy you say? small voice you say? shy you say?

]]> By: Suanie http://www.suanie.net/2006/07/07/wheres-your-blog-at/#comment-9922 Suanie Fri, 07 Jul 2006 07:16:15 +0000 http://www.suanie.net/2006/07/07/dude-wheres-your-blog/#comment-9922 ok amended the way i wrote it. ok amended the way i wrote it.

]]> By: Dabido(Teflon) http://www.suanie.net/2006/07/07/wheres-your-blog-at/#comment-9921 Dabido(Teflon) Fri, 07 Jul 2006 07:13:22 +0000 http://www.suanie.net/2006/07/07/dude-wheres-your-blog/#comment-9921 Suanie - Yeah, it's the title of the article, but it's not what he's saying. :-) Suanie - Yeah, it’s the title of the article, but it’s not what he’s saying. :-)

]]> By: Suanie http://www.suanie.net/2006/07/07/wheres-your-blog-at/#comment-9920 Suanie Fri, 07 Jul 2006 06:50:14 +0000 http://www.suanie.net/2006/07/07/dude-wheres-your-blog/#comment-9920 NigerLoh: err it's just early morning randomness :) tigerjoe: 25 only mah :) wingz: me neither Dabs: erm, that's the title of his article :) nice input. I know about the Patriot Act, still it's easy to use them as a benchmark. We've talked about this before. ST: yes that is the title of the article. where there is a link, one is meant to go read it fully and understand the conclusion I've summed up, that is credibility can be established even by one blogger, depends on where you go. So instead of saying, go read blogs to get more insight, one should say, go read [specific blog] to get more insight. NigerLoh: err it’s just early morning randomness :)

tigerjoe: 25 only mah :)

wingz: me neither

Dabs: erm, that’s the title of his article :) nice input. I know about the Patriot Act, still it’s easy to use them as a benchmark. We’ve talked about this before.

ST: yes that is the title of the article. where there is a link, one is meant to go read it fully and understand the conclusion I’ve summed up, that is credibility can be established even by one blogger, depends on where you go. So instead of saying, go read blogs to get more insight, one should say, go read [specific blog] to get more insight.

]]> By: ShaolinTiger http://www.suanie.net/2006/07/07/wheres-your-blog-at/#comment-9919 ShaolinTiger Fri, 07 Jul 2006 06:45:02 +0000 http://www.suanie.net/2006/07/07/dude-wheres-your-blog/#comment-9919 He didn't say it's not credible, read the article. He said some bloggers are credible, some aren't, same as newspapers. In the UK The Telegraph could be considered credible, The News of the World certainly could not (It published a front page story about Elvis being found alive on the moon), that doesn't mean newspapers are not credible, it just means not ALL newspapers are credible. Just the same as blogs. He didn’t say it’s not credible, read the article.

He said some bloggers are credible, some aren’t, same as newspapers.

In the UK The Telegraph could be considered credible, The News of the World certainly could not (It published a front page story about Elvis being found alive on the moon), that doesn’t mean newspapers are not credible, it just means not ALL newspapers are credible. Just the same as blogs.

]]> By: Dabido(Teflon) http://www.suanie.net/2006/07/07/wheres-your-blog-at/#comment-9918 Dabido(Teflon) Fri, 07 Jul 2006 05:27:39 +0000 http://www.suanie.net/2006/07/07/dude-wheres-your-blog/#comment-9918 <i>' Stephen Baker of ‘Business Week’ is saying that the blogosphere is not ‘credible’, '</i> He didn't say the blogsphere is not credibile. He said,'The blogosphere by itself has no credibility.' And after all, the blogsphere is a collective of ideas, so it is the same as a library. Books have no credibility, but the contents of the books either will or won't. We can find two book sitting next to each other in a library which often contradict each other. Same as the individual blogs ... but, blogs are like people. One might be credibile 99% of the time and slip up 1% of the time saying silly things. Others might just say silly things 99% of the time and have 1% credibilty. The only way for the blogsphere to be deemed to have credibility or no-credibility is if there was some sort of editorial commitee which censors the blogsphere, and as such controls the content. [Much like a newspaper], at which point, the blogsphere would cease to be a collective of ideas, and will start to become a tool of the editors opinions. <i>'Unlike the big US of A, we Malaysians do not have the First Amendment to protect our hides.'</i> Even the Americans don't have that anymore thanks to the USA PATRIOT ACT. If GW labels you a terrorist, then off to prison you go! <i>'the late Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah had a queen 50 years younger than him,'</i> It's good to be the Sultan! <i>'FREEDOM to agree or disagree is the best thing since <b>tenderloin steak.</b>'</i> I'll just assume you're not talking to me! :-) ‘ Stephen Baker of ‘Business Week’ is saying that the blogosphere is not ‘credible’, ‘

He didn’t say the blogsphere is not credibile. He said,’The blogosphere by itself has no credibility.’

And after all, the blogsphere is a collective of ideas, so it is the same as a library. Books have no credibility, but the contents of the books either will or won’t. We can find two book sitting next to each other in a library which often contradict each other.
Same as the individual blogs … but, blogs are like people. One might be credibile 99% of the time and slip up 1% of the time saying silly things.

Others might just say silly things 99% of the time and have 1% credibilty.

The only way for the blogsphere to be deemed to have credibility or no-credibility is if there was some sort of editorial commitee which censors the blogsphere, and as such controls the content. [Much like a newspaper], at which point, the blogsphere would cease to be a collective of ideas, and will start to become a tool of the editors opinions.

‘Unlike the big US of A, we Malaysians do not have the First Amendment to protect our hides.’

Even the Americans don’t have that anymore thanks to the USA PATRIOT ACT. If GW labels you a terrorist, then off to prison you go!

‘the late Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah had a queen 50 years younger than him,’

It’s good to be the Sultan!

‘FREEDOM to agree or disagree is the best thing since tenderloin steak.‘

I’ll just assume you’re not talking to me! :-)

]]>