Comments on: i don’t understand http://www.suanie.net/2005/06/22/i-dont-understand/ Yet another personal blog, only better ;) Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:08:48 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: suanie http://www.suanie.net/2005/06/22/i-dont-understand/#comment-1918 suanie Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:09:26 +0000 #comment-1918 pay lah... money makes the world go round. i need to be more round. pay lah… money makes the world go round. i need to be more round.

]]> By: MorpheusX http://www.suanie.net/2005/06/22/i-dont-understand/#comment-1911 MorpheusX Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:37:33 +0000 #comment-1911 so its Suanie the preacher now eh.... i would like to attend your sermons.....kekkekek Date? time ? location?? so its Suanie the preacher now eh….
i would like to attend your sermons…..kekkekek
Date? time ? location??

]]> By: suanie http://www.suanie.net/2005/06/22/i-dont-understand/#comment-1904 suanie Thu, 23 Jun 2005 02:07:09 +0000 #comment-1904 maybe cos I'm the most un-Buddhist of all Buddhists. Or maybe because I am a practical Buddhist, that's why people look up to me nyah nyah nyah! maybe cos I’m the most un-Buddhist of all Buddhists.

Or maybe because I am a practical Buddhist, that’s why people look up to me nyah nyah nyah!

]]> By: minishorts http://www.suanie.net/2005/06/22/i-dont-understand/#comment-1905 minishorts Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:57:41 +0000 #comment-1905 wah i dont understand why ppl come to discuss buddhism with suanie man. ahahhaha wah i dont understand why ppl come to discuss buddhism with suanie man.

ahahhaha

]]> By: suanie http://www.suanie.net/2005/06/22/i-dont-understand/#comment-1894 suanie Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:07:59 +0000 #comment-1894 <b>torment</b>: cheers :) <b>ahseng</b>: me neither! <b>bob</b>: yeap I guess :) torment: cheers :)
ahseng: me neither!
bob: yeap I guess :)

]]> By: bob http://www.suanie.net/2005/06/22/i-dont-understand/#comment-1923 bob Wed, 22 Jun 2005 22:14:05 +0000 #comment-1923 it's all in the delivery sweetheart. you said it. it’s all in the delivery sweetheart. you said it.

]]> By: PrincessRunningwater http://www.suanie.net/2005/06/22/i-dont-understand/#comment-1922 PrincessRunningwater Wed, 22 Jun 2005 21:21:18 +0000 #comment-1922 Hey suanie! thanks for popping into my world! u would not imagine the happiness that spread all over my face when i got into my webbie and saw that there were 3 comments!!! Thanks Suanie.. :) certainly made a new blogger's day! anyway, care to enlighten me on this pps thingy? Hey suanie! thanks for popping into my world! u would not imagine the happiness that spread all over my face when i got into my webbie and saw that there were 3 comments!!! Thanks Suanie.. :) certainly made a new blogger’s day!
anyway, care to enlighten me on this pps thingy?

]]> By: ahseng http://www.suanie.net/2005/06/22/i-dont-understand/#comment-1921 ahseng Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:56:00 +0000 #comment-1921 I really don't understand why I don't have enough money... dammit... dammit.... dammitt..... I really don’t understand why I don’t have enough money… dammit… dammit…. dammitt…..

]]> By: viewtru http://www.suanie.net/2005/06/22/i-dont-understand/#comment-1920 viewtru Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:50:54 +0000 #comment-1920 I will reply this one as well. Siddharta explained that in rebirth, it is the sankaras(mental reactions) from a departed person that get grabbed by a newly born baby. So when a baby is born, it already has these reactions inherited from a former dead guy. But is the baby a new person, or the old one? Buddha never did believe in the concept of 'soul'. I don't think he ever did mention that the sankaras were passed on as a on-to-one basis. Meaning one person dies and one new baby is born. If that is true, populations will never increase. I do not know what the truth is. But Buddhas come and go through the ages. Siddharta was the most famous Buddha because he put down his discourses in writing. But I don't think two Buddhas can have exact identical views of life. Our human purpose is to take care of this life. The next life, if there is one, can take care of itself. I will reply this one as well. Siddharta explained that in rebirth, it is the sankaras(mental reactions) from a departed person that get grabbed by a newly born baby. So when a baby is born, it already has these reactions inherited from a former dead guy. But is the baby a new person, or the old one? Buddha never did believe in the concept of ’soul’. I don’t think he ever did mention that the sankaras were passed on as a on-to-one basis. Meaning one person dies and one new baby is born. If that is true, populations will never increase. I do not know what the truth is. But Buddhas come and go through the ages. Siddharta was the most famous Buddha because he put down his discourses in writing. But I don’t think two Buddhas can have exact identical views of life. Our human purpose is to take care of this life. The next life, if there is one, can take care of itself.

]]> By: torment http://www.suanie.net/2005/06/22/i-dont-understand/#comment-1899 torment Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:42:12 +0000 #comment-1899 Be true to yourself. Best damn advice I ever got. Be true to yourself. Best damn advice I ever got.

]]>